logo

48 pages 1 hour read

Living Downstream: A Scientist's Personal Investigation of Cancer and the Environment

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 1997

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 11-12Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 11 Summary: “Our Bodies Inscribed”

Body burden refers to the total of chemical exposures in the body—and how and where chemicals enter the body. Steingraber compares this to the reading of seasonal growth rings on trees. Body burden measures cumulative exposure but requires extensive sampling and is best completed during autopsy or archived human tissues. Biomonitoring, which records the levels of contamination in humans through blood and urine, is effective because it doesn’t rely on questionnaires, surveys, interviews, or personal anecdotes. It’s the drug test of the ecological world. Its success depends on sampling a large enough representative population and sufficient time to detect trends. Biomonitoring of children with high levels of lead contamination from gasoline successfully led to the elimination of lead from gasoline in the 1970s. Eliminating smoke inhalation has also decreased toxins, though this has a long way to go.

In 1999, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) examined a sampling of the US population. The results suggest that nearly all US residents have chemicals used in flame-retardant materials, which act like PCBs in their bodies, or similar chemicals that appear to be greater in children and women of reproductive age. The study suggested, however, that PCBs had declined and that persistent organic pollutants had declined in pregnant women as compared to 50 years earlier. This suggests that bans work to reduce exposure. Advances in chemistry have made detecting contaminations easier than a decade ago, and biomonitoring has become a popular method of examining contamination in highly prone areas. The drawback to biomonitoring is that it can’t tell us where contaminants came from or how they entered the body and is thus most meaningful when combined with other types of analysis.

While biology can tell us a lot about mitosis, or cell division and replication, cancer cells don’t follow a specific, traceable pattern. Cancer cells are known for their unlimited growth as well as their potential to be invasive and revert to an earlier stage of development. Cancer cells develop in several distinct ways, the most known of which is through incremental changes to chromosomal DNA. Encounters with carcinogens help genes control cell division.

Along with the sporadic behavior of developing cancer cells, tumors take significant time to develop, often requiring decades to grow. Additionally, tumor growth can slow down at any point during its development. Initiation is a term that molecular biologists assign to the starting stages (small structural alterations) of a cell’s DNA strands. After a cell is initiated, it is transformed, as carcinogenesis is complete. To show up as a symptom of malignant cancer, the transformed cell must pass undetected through the body’s immune system.

Recent studies suggest, however, that the transformation of a normal cell into a malignant, cancerous cell may not always be the result of physical injury to genes. Rather, other factors at work in the human body may initiate the transformation. This discovery may help explain why the amounts and location of exposure to toxic chemicals varies from person to person. One such factor is obesity, which interferes with the body’s insulin production. Biological markers can help reveal past exposure and future cancers that biomonitoring can’t. This growing awareness has increased interest in biological studies of cancer cells.

Chapter 12 Summary: “Ecological Roots”

A study of twins suggested that their genes become different as they age and that genetic markers look increasingly different the more time they spend apart as adults. Studies suggest that this highlights the importance of environmental factors in creating biological differences in shared genes. Steingraber wonders if the reverse might be true in adopted siblings—that the longer people share an environment, the more alike they become. While epidemiologists view adoptee data as significant because of the separation of genetic origins from environmental influences, these studies are difficult due to the secrecy associated with adoption records. Therefore, studying twins can offer clues to the role of DNA in cancer. Inherited genetic factors play a small role in cancer causation.

Humans have a much smaller number of genes than researchers had predicted. It takes many hundreds of genes to cause cancerous tumors in the human body, suggesting “intercourse” with the ecological world, and they do so differently at different points of human development. Other studies have substantiated that pancreatic cancer results from the interaction between family history and environmental factors. Family history without environmental exposure slows the progression of disease and increases survival.

Steingraber cites an article about a study with mice at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) that transformed healthy cells into cancer cells using the DNA from a human bladder tumor. The researchers were able to identify the segment of DNA responsible for the transformation. Since the study’s publication, Steingraber points out that new information about the relationship between various genes and bladder carcinogens has emerged.

Between 1973 and 1991, incidence of bladder cancer increased 10% and has stayed consistent. However, bladder carcinogens were one of the earliest ever identified and decoded. The question now is less about how the cancer develops but why with so much evidence collected over the decades powerful bladder carcinogens continue to be produced, imported, and released into the environment. One issue standing in the way of addressing the environmental roots of cancer is the notion of lifestyle. Much like the reputation of cholera in the 1800s, the assumption is that cancer develops in individuals who practice unsafe lifestyles, such as smoking, eating an unhealthy diet, or working in an industry that puts them at high risk.

Additionally, reporting and assigning percentages of cancer incidence without analyzing risk factors for each case is ineffective. The past must shape the way we view the current cancer situation, and we must use that information to predict an alternative future, reading the history of the body equally as a history of chemical exposure. If we study our ecological roots, we can better address the situation. Steingraber posits that the current system of using and disposing of toxic chemicals known to be suspected carcinogens is a human rights issue. We need to practice the precautionary principle, identifying a lack of harm as much as existence of harm in our environment.

Chapters 11-12 Analysis

The concluding two chapters of Steingraber’s book elicit consideration of both the physical and social impacts of cancer as well as new ways in which to approach future studies of carcinogens. Additionally, Steingraber contends that “the story of cancer’s ecological roots is a story of disconnections” (283). Much of the disconnection occurs in cancer literature, particularly pamphlets that she has collected over several years. These publications say little to nothing about environmental contamination as a risk factor for cancer, and many cite lifestyle as the main risk factor. For example, bladder cancer is often attributed to tobacco use—but what causes bladder cancer in individuals, such as Steingraber, who do not use tobacco is unclear: “By emphasizing personal habits rather than carcinogens, they frame the cause of the disease as a problem of behavior rather than as a problem of exposure to disease-causing agents” (272).

Another issue centers on the willingness and capability to test chemicals. As Steingraber argues, understanding how these possible toxins develop into cancer is difficult if they haven’t been (or can’t be) tested. In lieu of testing, individuals can help proactively fend off possible carcinogens by searching for their ecological roots. This search entails an intimate education about the world around us. It allows, or forces, us to learn about the origins of our drinking water, the air we breathe, and the agricultural practices within our communities. Once we take these roots into consideration, we can continue to navigate the complexities of environmental carcinogens. Steingraber concludes, “What’s needed now is not more data but what is always needed in a crisis: vision, courage, and the willingness to not be paralyzed by uncertainty” (284).

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 48 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools