logo

54 pages 1 hour read

Monster

Fiction | Novel | YA | Published in 1999

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Pages 201-281Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Pages 201-205 Summary: Journal Entry

Steve writes on Tuesday afternoon after a visit from Kathy, who is struggling with her defense case. She reiterates that they must find a way to differentiate Steve from the others involved in the case. Kathy has Steve make a list of people he loves and admires. Her intention is to call character witnesses on Steve’s behalf. Their discussion depresses Steve more than anything has since he has been in jail. Steve wishes he could speak to his brother Jerry. He writes: “What would I say to him? Think about all the tomorrows of your life” (205).

Pages 206-267 Summary: Screenplay Scenes

Asa puts character witnesses on the stand to support King. The first is Dorothy Moore, his cousin, who testifies that King came to see her the day of the robbery and brought her a lamp. When the prosecutor asks if she still has the lamp, Dorothy admits she does not. The second witness is Mr. Nipping, who has known King since he was a little boy. Nipping testifies that King is left-handed, which may be significant since the gun that killed Nesbitt was fired with a right hand.

The narrative shifts briefly to a lecture about film from Mr. Sawicki. The teacher is reminding his students not to keep their storytelling simple. He says, “When you see a filmmaker getting too fancy, you can bet he’s worried either about his story or about his ability to tell it” (214).

The scene shifts to an anxious Kathy, pacing in a holding cell as Steve sits watching her. She tells Steve he must take the stand. She says she believes the jury wants to hear from Steve, which will give him the opportunity at last to put some distance between himself and King, who is not going to testify. She counsels Steve to avoid appearing to be a tough guy. To prep Steve without telling him exactly what she wants him to say, Kathy employs “the cup game.” She asks him a question and turns the cup up or down depending upon whether she likes the answer.

It is night in Steve’s jail cell. Steve and three other inmates are discussing how the truth doesn’t matter once you have been charged with a crime. The only thing that matters at that point is saying whatever is necessary to get out of jail.

Steve is on the witness stand being questioned by Kathy. He denies being a lookout for the robbery or being in the drugstore on the day of the robbery. The prosecutor spends more time cross-examining Steve than Kathy did soliciting his testimony. Though anxious, Steve answers Sandra’s questions to Kathy’s satisfaction. After his testimony, he returns to the defense table.

Kathy calls Mr. Sawicki as a character witness. He portrays Steve as a responsible, thoughtful, caring person. The prosecutor attempts to prove that Sawicki cannot really know Steve well enough to judge his character, which Sawicki rebuffs, saying, “It is my belief that to make an honest film, one has to be an honest person. I would say that. And I do believe in Steve’s honesty” (237).

The scene shifts briefly to Steve lying on his cot in his cell, still anxious. Momentarily, the scene shifts back to the courtroom where King’s attorney is making his closing arguments. He portrays Bobo as the actual killer who is trying to escape his rightful punishment by blaming King. He also assails the insufficient investigatory work of the police.

After Asa closes, Kathy makes her final argument to the jury. She thanks them for paying attention. She reviews the testimony, emphasizing what she considers the most important elements and showing that there is no direct evidence that Steve participated in the robbery. Using simple logic and developing her remarks around the testimony and the character of each witness, she stresses that there is ample doubt that Steve is guilty.

Last, the prosecutor makes her final arguments. She discounts the remarks of the defense attorneys disparaging her witnesses. She reviews the testimony and argues that there were four people who plotted the robbery and thus all four are equally guilty of the murder of Mr. Nesbitt. The scene shifts to meandering camera shots as the judge gives the jury instructions and dismisses them to reach a verdict.

During the time of deliberation, Steve and King remain in a holding cell together. Steve is frightened. King tries to sound cavalier. A guard informs them that there is a betting pool concerning how long their sentences will be when they are found guilty, and he asks the defendants if they want in on the bet.

Pages 269-271 Summary: Journal Entry

Steve has been returned to his cell; the jury still deliberating his guilt. He relates that his anxiety level is near panic. He cannot think or feel about anything but his court case and is already planning his appeal. He writes, “Nothing is real around me except the panic” (271).

Pages 272-277 Summary: Screenplay Scenes

The final screenplay scene takes place at the courthouse with a guard telling the defendants that the jury has returned a verdict. Steve stands with Kathy, who tells him they will file an appeal if he is found guilty. As the jury comes in, Steve begins to imagine credits rolling across a screen like at the end of a movie.

The jury foreman reads the verdict that King has been found guilty. He is immediately taken away. Steve watches his mother’s face and sees her relief as the foreman reads the verdict: Steve is not guilty. He turns to embrace Kathy, but she gathers her papers and turns away from him.

Pages 279-281 Summary: Journal Entry

The last journal entry comes almost a year after the robbery and five months after Steve’s acquittal. Steve lingers on his persistent habit of self-filming. He makes videos of himself as if trying to determine who he really is and to assure himself that he is not a monster. He says, “I want to look at myself a thousand times for one true image” (281).

Pages 201-281 Analysis

The final third of the narrative is primarily concerned not with the truth of what happened. Through Steve, Myers has laid out enough descriptive material for the reader to have reached a decision about the robbery, about who was involved, and about what they did or did not do. This segment deals with defense attorneys arguing their cases and with what is going on with Steve as his inner struggles continue. The focus of the defense lawyers is not on the truth but on doubt.

Asa, King’s attorney, is not going to put King on the stand, knowing he would be confronted about lying the police, further damaging his credibility. Thus, Asa must rely on making the other witnesses seem worse that King, planting doubt in the jury’s mind. Kathy, while pointing out Bobo’s questionable character, uses a different tactic by stressing the lack of direct evidence against Steve and highlighting his willingness to take the stand and answer respectfully in his own defense.

Because he has created a protagonist who is in large measure responsible for what has happened to himself, whether he is guilty of felony murder or not, Myers has also placed the reader in the position of sympathizing with thousands of nameless prison inmates who daily suffer the indignities, fear, and deprivation Steve describes in his journal. Most readers, regardless of whether they perceive Steve to be innocent or guilty, will likely pull for the jury to acquit him. This may be in large measure because of the hellish punishment jail has already heaped upon him and because he is presented as a redeemable character who cares about the opinions and welfare of others and fears that he might be the monster the prosecutor described.

One final irony that might be noted occurs in the holding cell scene in which the guards reveal that they have a betting pool going regarding how much time Steve and King will receive if they are found guilty. Steve is sickened by the prospect of the wagering and turns away without making a response. The guard taunts him, saying, “That a yes or a no.” This echoes Steve exiting the drugstore without giving a clear yes or no signal to Bobo and King (which ultimately led to them entering the store and committing the robbery and murder). Steve may be innocent of murder, but his ambivalence had terrible consequences for himself and others.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 54 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools