logo

53 pages 1 hour read

Revolutionary Road

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1961

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Masculinity Against the Backdrop of 1950s Conformist Society

The immediate years following the end of World War II saw an unprecedented rise in American power and influence. It also witnessed the terrible consequences of mankind’s search for greater weapons, namely the advent of atomic weapons and the possibility of complete annihilation. The developments of the Cold War and the Korean War placed Americans in a situation unparalleled in the nation’s history. Americans became more affluent than ever before, and this affluence became a line of demarcation between American capitalism versus Soviet communism. Moreover, with the Soviet Union being a single-party communist republic, Americans saw themselves as not only the defenders of capitalism but of democracy. These circumstances resulted in a national desire for a clear-cut definition of the American way of life and a desire to retract into a safe and secure haven where the problems of a dangerous world could be ignored. Thus, the 1950s witnessed a call for conformity that redefined the characteristics of the American populace.

One redefinition was the role of men in society. In the aftermath of war, men were tasked with adapting military masculinity to one confined to suburban spaces, specifically as a father, a husband, and most importantly, a consumer. This transformation is best personified in Revolutionary Road through the character of Shep Campbell. During the war, Shep was the stereotypical American tough guy. He shied away from all things cultural and intellectual, preferring to work with his hands and street smarts. The idea of a man’s hands being built for physical labor is a notion with which Frank Wheeler struggles. Throughout Part 1, Chapter 3, Frank remembers his father’s hands: “it wasn’t only their strength he envied, it was their sureness and sensitivity” (36). By comparison, Frank views his hands as “bloated and pale” (35). Later in the chapter, Frank goes out to work on the stone pathway in their yard, a task he considers “man’s work” (45). He is wearing some old army fatigues, another reminder of his previous masculinity. Frank served in the army during the war, but he doesn’t have the sort of credentials Shep has. Shep was a paratrooper, and he won the Silver Star and a field commission, both difficult to achieve. The Silver Star is the third highest combat metal, and a field commission means that because of exceptional leadership skills displayed on the battlefield, a non-commissioned officer (NCO) becomes eligible to move to the rank of a commissioned officer (lieutenant and higher). If the reader ever doubted Shep’s masculinity, his military record provides proof enough. Regardless, men like Shep and Frank transitioned from military life into one of complacency and consumerism, and many of them struggled to redefine themselves in society.

Despite being more traditionally masculine, Shep is the one who adapts best to these new circumstances. According to his biography in Part 2, Chapter 2, he only experienced one existential crisis in Arizona, but moving back east and realizing that he could not easily recover his lost chances for an intellectual life, he accepted the first job offered to him. After the war, Frank too sought freedom in intellectualism; however, unlike his counterpart, Frank could never find work that gave him contentment. Shep was able to adapt better than Frank because he had selected a career he felt was “unquestionably masculine” (139): mechanical engineering. In Shep viewing his career as such, he felt less emasculated in a consumer lifestyle, a lifestyle previously associated solely with femininity.

It is through such character illustrations that Richard Yates attempts to show the difficulties many men faced returning from war to a new definition of the masculine American male. The soldier was removed and, unlike those from the First World War, was not transplanted into a society that esteemed the hard-working, highly productive male laborer who could see the results of his hard work. Rather, they returned to a society with a growing number of white-collar jobs whose productive results were subsumed by the corporation, resulting in labor alienation. With this, a man’s primary role was to serve as father, husband, and consumer to fuel the capitalist engine. While Shep adapts to this role more readily, Yates highlights his imperfect happiness; he is wistful when thinking about intellectual life, and he is in love with April, not his wife. As such, Yates undermines the validity of stereotypical American masculinity as ultimately unfulfilling.

American Suburbia and the American Dream

The definition of the American Dream, other than the pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness, changes with the times, desires, and abilities of the American public. In frontier times, for example, it was the dream of exploring and owning land—manifest destiny. In the 1950s, the dream was similar but more materialistic. Following the end of World War II, America experienced a tremendous economic boom, and with this newfound affluence, many Americans sought to own their own homes. The majority of these homes were built near cities in what came to be known as the suburbs. It is in the suburbs that Frank and April Wheeler live, along with their neighbors. Though they were designed to project American superiority and happiness, the suburbs were fraught with the same human weaknesses that any community throughout history has experienced. It is this human weakness that Yates works to expose throughout Revolutionary Road.

As suburban areas expanded in the late 1940s and early 1950s, a very specific socio-economic culture developed along with it. This culture was influenced by established American traditions, such as the Protestant work ethic, but also by foreign influences as well. Perhaps the greatest drive towards the conformity of suburban American culture was the fear of the spread of communism and nuclear annihilation. Beginning in the late 1940s, a certain senator from Wisconsin, Joseph McCarthy, spearheaded a movement to combat a perceived widespread communist subversion of American politics and culture. This fear gained impetus during the notorious trial of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, who were convicted of spying for the Soviet Union and providing them with nuclear secrets. They were both executed for treason in 1953. Consequently, the rise of Soviet nuclear power and capabilities spread the realization of possible nuclear annihilation. As a result, there was a drive to conform to a specific and pragmatically American lifestyle during the 1950s. This lifestyle took the quintessential form of the traditional family nucleus (father, mother, children), living in their own home in the suburbs, preferably with a white picket fence and plenty of material goods to make life easier and more comfortable. The father would go to a typical nine-to-five job, and the mother stayed at home to clean, cook, and take care of the kids after school. To attain such a lifestyle marked a person as successful. However, Yates shows that fulfilling the American dream of a suburban lifestyle is ultimately baseless if it is attained at the expense of one’s personal dreams. Frank, April, and their children appear like the ideal American family but their life is marked with deep unhappiness and dissatisfaction. April, in particular, feels like she has been trapped in this existence, which is all about keeping up appearances, when she would have rather pursued a career in acting or a life in Europe.

The image behind suburban culture was designed to ease American fears of war and communist subversion by being surrounded by other patriotic Americans. It also was meant to purport a belief in invincibility and an end to suffering. This was accomplished by putting on a good face. In the novel, Helen Givings personifies the notion of ignoring everything upsetting and talking only about positives, the main criticism John has of his mother’s behavior. Furthermore, it was this critique of ignoring upsetting aspects of life that drove writers like Richard Yates to tear down the façade of perfection erected by American suburbia. The dark underbelly of the midcentury American dream included aspects like continued institutionalized racism through segregation. Additionally, the emphasis on conformity was maintained through fear, as those accused of being communists were frequently fired from their jobs and cast out of their communities. With this, the American Dream remained fragile even for those who played their parts perfectly.

Women’s Roles in Post-World War II America

In the same interview for Ploughshares mentioned in the Overview, Richard Yates hinted at the idea that April Wheeler is the true protagonist of the novel and not Frank Wheeler. It is befitting that a book about life in the 1950s would have the man as the main protagonist ostensibly while the woman, the most dynamic character in that novel, is pushed into the background: The novel’s structure mirrors the troubles women experienced before the emergence of second-wave feminism in the 1960s, namely having to take a secondary role in a male-dominated society. Every female character in Revolutionary Road is an indictment of that hierarchy, regardless of how content those characters might feel with their lives.

Despite being the perfect housewife, Milly Campbell shows the wide discrepancies between men’s and women’s roles in this era. Shep specifically married her not for her character or because she was attractive, but because he saw in her a woman who would stay by him, be loyal, and with whom he could raise a family. Of course, the raising of that family would fall predominantly on her shoulders being the primary caregiver and homemaker. Though Shep does come to love her, it is more a love of mutual respect rather than what one might expect between a wife and husband. When Shep has his brief affair with April, the woman for whom he has longed with a fiery passion, there is no sense of guilt or remorse for being disloyal to Milly. Ultimately, a society that privileges men dehumanizes women; Shep cannot view himself as betraying his wife because he believes his feelings are more valid as a man. Similarly, Frank refuses to atone when he breaks up with Maureen because he feels he has done nothing wrong despite hurting her.

Norma Townsend and Maureen Grube represent women making their way through the world without an accompanying male partner. The reader learns very little about Norma, and most of what they do learn is tainted by Frank’s perceptions of her. Nevertheless, what Norma’s interaction with Frank displays is the blatant sexism she must deal with from men who will not take her seriously because of her independent nature and lack of sex appeal. Maureen fares better than Norma in terms of physical attraction, but she earns very few social advantages from her beauty. Both women are at the mercy of the men with whom they choose to interact.

Of course, the novel’s greatest advocate for women’s rights, and the one who best illustrates a sense of subjugation in the socio-economic situation, is April Wheeler. April openly admits in Part 1, Chapter 7 that she accepts some responsibility for her being in the unhappy situation they are in. She also considers whether society’s expectations are at all valid, stating: “That’s how we both got committed to this enormous delusion—because that what it is, an enormous, obscene delusion—this idea that people have to resign from real life and ‘settle down’ when they have families” (112). With this, April highlights the misplaced belief that people must behave a certain way when they marry and have children. In acknowledging that the issue is with society’s expectations for women, April sees that a way out is necessary for her happiness and fulfillment. Finding a way out becomes a matter of self-actualization, ultimately of life and death. Importantly, given women’s and men’s unequal power in the 1950s, April cannot accomplish this move on her own. She had no income of her own, and women’s salaries were unequal to men’s. No-fault divorce wasn’t legalized in the US until the 1970s, meaning April could not have simply left Frank. For these and other socio-economic reasons, April was much attached to Frank’s acceptance of her plan, and Frank was dependent on April to remain with him.

April Wheeler’s character provides the novel with the motto that a woman who struggles against conformity is doomed to fail. However, it also questions what a woman who plays her role perfectly has won. The novel ends with Helen Givings decrying the Wheelers as the wrong sort of people but her husband tunes her out by turning off his hearing aid; Helen might have the colonial home, the husband, and the perfect suburban life, but she is ultimately devalued and literally silenced.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 53 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools