The Organ Thieves: The Shocking Story of the First Heart Transplant in the Segregated South

Using textual evidence, examine the impact of racism on the treatment of Bruce Tucker and his family. Consider whether or not you think Bruce’s organs would have been taken had he been white.

Reflect on how the historical and political context of Richmond, Virginia in 1968 factored into the decision to remove Bruce Tucker’s organs. If it did not, why was it perceived to have been a factor?

Barnard received rock star treatment, even after the heart recipient died. What does this indicate about societal values and the perceived cultural role of medical professionals?

In the aftermath of MCV’s first human heart transplant, what did the institution’s approach to the press indicate about its priorities? How fair was the press coverage to MCV and the Tucker family?

Who was most responsible for the unlawful removal of Bruce Tucker’s organs? Hume? Fatteh? Lower? The physician who pronounced his death? Explain your decision.

Did the surgeons performing the early kidney and heart transplants in the 1960s and 1970s violate medical ethics? If so, in what ways? If not, why not? Use textual and other evidence in examining this question.

Why did Judge Compton change his mind and allow the jury to consider the notion of brain death? Was this the correct decision? Why or why not? Use textual and other evidence in examining this question.

Had the jury ruled in favor of Tucker, would medical progress have been impeded, or did the defense counsel exaggerate this potential? Explain your reasoning using textual and other evidence.